Peer Reviewed Publications

"Bodies and Souls: The Case for Reading Revelation 18:13 as a Critique of the Slave Trade" in New Testament Studies

Synopsis: The list of commodities consumed by Babylon concludes with the words, "bodies and souls of men." Many commentators assert that these words constitute a critique of the slave trade, but this assertion has not been adequately demonstrated. In this paper, I present a series of arguments rooted in the extant Greco-Roman literature supporting the conclusion that Rev 18:13 is indeed an early Christian critique of the Roman slave trade.
Access: Scheduled for publication in July 2018. Check back later!

“Grant Slaves Equality: Re-Examining the Translation of Colossians 4:1.” Tyndale Bulletin 68.1 (2017): 59–71. 

Synopsis: Most scholars agree that Col 4:1 should be rendered, "Masters, treat your slaves justly and fairly" (RSV). I offer a fresh challenge to this view. Based on the use of the term ἰσότης in the extant Greek literature, I argue that Col 4:1 should instead be rendered, "Masters, grant your slaves justice and equality." Thus the command is much stronger than most scholars have realized.
Access: Click here for a free electronic copy. Click here to order a hard copy.

“Sell Your Possessions: Luke 12:33 and the Greco-Roman Utopian Ideal.” Southeastern Theological Review 8.1 (2017): 19–37. 

Synopsis: What does Jesus mean when he commands his disciples, "Sell your possessions and give alms"? Drawing on the insights of redaction criticism and the background of Greco-Roman utopianism, I argue that Luke 12:33 is not a command to relinquish all possessions and embrace poverty; rather, it is a command to relinquish all superfluous possessions (luxuries) and embrace equality.
Access: Click here for a free electronic copy. Click here for audio of my presentation of this paper at a symposium.

"The Law and Justification in Luke’s Theology" in Essays Exploring New Testament Texts: Biblical Research Methods Applied 

Synopsis: Based on Acts 13:38-39, a number of scholars argue that Luke, unlike Paul, believed Jews were partially justified through the law. In this essay, I utilize redaction and narrative criticism to demonstrate that the notion of a partial justification through the law is incompatible with Luke’s theology.
Access: Pending publication. Check back later!

No comments: